|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Body Tondi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“A tondo
(plural "tondi") is a Renaissance term for
a circular work of art, either a painting or a sculpture." ....(Wikipedia.com)
I love the way a circular canvas “tondo” has no corners
or straight lines. It looks like it could just spin off the wall! Gone
is the stable axis of horizontals and verticals within which to insert
the body image. Instead, the circle alludes to a different way of perceiving
spatial relationships. Rather than aligning to the grid, the tondo conveys
the idea of things in the round and rotating in space. The association
is hardly new...
“ ..the earliest textual incidence of the word is found in dolce
stil nuovo verse, (12-14th century style of poetry) where it connoted
the cosmos, completeness, and perfection... within the domestic secular
environment where so many of the tondi were displayed, the circular form
functioned to define a sacred space...” (Olsen, Roberta (2000),
The Florentine tondo”)
The cosmic and sacred space associated with the
tondo makes an interesting counterpart to my focus (in the mirror)
of close-ups of my own body. The illusion of a depth of field becomes
ambiguous in extreme. While it's clear that one is looking at the magnification
of the skin, there is also a parallel otherwordly sense of the reference
veiled in history of the cosmos. Round moles and blemishes on the skin
appear like planets, moving in rotation and encircled within the same
language of rounds.
Historically, tondo paintings diminished the importance
of the background, drawing attention instead to the figures in relative
close-up view. I take this a stage further and eliminate the background
of the figure altogether. These magnifications at the edge of one's depth
of field, transform the body image into an ambiguous terrain of spaciousness
and mystery, while still retaining the imprint of human life.
Gwen Hardie, May 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Unfamiliar
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Unfamiliar Body describes my exploration of perceptions of the body.
Areas of the body resemble one another at close range. I choose the armpit
in this first series of body paintings because of bimorphic qualities.
Though accurately depicted, it invites multiple readings, often much
more sexual. I am drawn to the quiet, neutral quality of the armpit because
it exists between the more familiar focal points of the body. The sexualization
of this neutral image interests me. It points to a way of addressing
the body in painting that can be sensual and sexual without being voyeuristic.
The sexualization is more to do with the articulation of form, surface
of skin and play of light; its more about a seductive way of seeing rather
than objectifying the body itself.
The feeling I am trying to convey in these paintings is one of dissolving
boundaries between subject and object rather than looking as a voyeur
from a distance. Here is an invitation to jump into the luxuriousness
of the body, or to the idea of bodily-reality. The close-up intimate
world of the body however gives way to a sense of open space and edgelessness,
which can seem comforting or disarming.
The light I explore is from the sun. It’s so powerful that it
illuminates what lies just under the surface of the skin and yet the
body is dense enough to contain impenetrable spaces of darkness. I use
the light and the darkness to expose nakedness and allude to hidden depths.
The light becomes an agent of seduction.
Gwen Hardie, October 29 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Ginevra Project, Italy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard
Da Vinci’s portrait of Ginevra
de Benci, was the inspiration for this project which I undertook while
in residence at The Liguria Study Center in Bogliasco. I positioned
myself under the skylight in my studio, so that the shadow falling
onto my lips and chin area was almost identical to that which fell
onto Ginevra.
My project fell into 2 parts- the first was a series
of oil paintings about how light falls on the bottom lip and the nuances
of shadows that it creates, thus referencing the sfumato technique of
which Leonardo was such a master. I became more and more sensitive to
and intrigued by the idea of a vanishing point between light and shadow
that could be seen under Ginevras lower lip- this says more about the
power of oil paint to create an illusion than of course it does about
the subject. It was clear that the identity of the subject was almost
irrelevant in this part of the project.
The second part was done in guaoche, where I painted the lips and chin
area of The Ginevra portrait, followed by all the fellows, who were positioned
in the same light situation and angle of Ginevra. With all the criteria
being the same, except for the subject, it became a study about human
variety up-close. In each case, I wanted to try with the minimum of information,
to evoke a sense of a live human presence and show something of the bearing
and character of the individual., as they sat before me, defined by the
falling light from the sun.
Although my focus on the Ginevra portrait was restricted to hardly
more than a square inch around the lower lip and chin, I could experience
the sublime beauty of Leonardos vision perhaps more intensely than if
I were only looking .at the painting. I found confirmation in the idea
that it is possible within such a tight crop to convey a world view.
The most challenging aspect of the project was imagining a much closer
space between Leonardo and Ginevra, so close that all the angles on the
periphery of his field of vision would be distorted, as they move out
of the picture frame. I wanted to maintain the same angle of the viewpoint
between artist and subject, realising that any shift up or down changes
how we perceive the subject.
What started to become clear in this project, is my attraction to the
neutrality of Leonardos portrayals of people- it is a neutrality so delicate
and powerful simultaneously that allows us to be transported into a world
of heightened sensitivity to time passing, as witnessed by the exacting
analysis of light on the face.
Gwen Hardie , February 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light and
shadow on the surface of the face obscures and reveals details such as
lines, textures and muscular tension. I observe the face close enough
to convey the experience of looking at the edge of our depth of field.
Everything changes close up, forcing a heightened awareness of human
presence at the same time as limiting the information about the subject.
Reflected in this tight crop of the human face is the light from the sun.
I choose natural light because of its neutral qualities and its capacity
to cast an infinite range of colors and tones in our perception.
I paint quickly, wet into wet, so that the film of paint comes together
in its entirety in one go. The image that works is often the result of
many rejected versions of the same subject.. The painted surface must look
unlaboured, fresh, as if easily coming together, while still creating the
illusion of the subject with enough accuracy.
Photography encompasses both objective fact and the subjective response;
this is appealing. To a certain extent, I try to use my eye in a
similar way to the camera, isolating and recording the facts.
The experience of looking over time at the subject rather than in the split
second of the camera gives a more experiential way of observing-a combination
of seeing, absorbing and feeling all at the same time.
When I observe another person’s face, I am captivated by their inner
state. When I look at myself, the emotion becomes more neutral so that
I can concentrate on the act of observation.
I see the face as a kind of testimony to life and death, both monumental
and fragile, permeable and impermanent. Gwen Hardie, August 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Close -
Up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small parts
of the face such as the eyes, the lips, the nostrils or just a few inches
of neck or cheek hint at the inner world of a person. I select, crop and
magnify parts of my and others’ faces as if through the camera lens,
only painting from life.
The quality of observation interests me, painting being an act of observation
over an entire day, rather than the few minutes it takes to record on
camera. Observing over time gives way to an experiential sense of the
subject, where the question of subject/object begins to dissolve.
The kinds of distortions in spatial relationships that occur at very close
range inform these paintings. I want to create the sense of being so close
up to the subject, that the subject becomes both immediate as a real presence
and at the same time mysterious and elusive. Gwen Hardie, december
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light and
Dark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light and
dark and the space between. Lightness relates to the idea of sunlight
on the surface of material objects, defining a physical presence. Darkness
relates to the shadows of these material objects, conveying uncertainties
of spatial depth. Form takes shape in the minds eye with simple illusionist
devices. Playing with this, I tease the eye into a back and forth movement
between an illusion of something concrete and an illusion of immateriality.
If its too tangible, its not working; if its too vague, its not working.
Only the point where two readings of the same image are coexisting, does
the image begin to work. Gwen Hardie, august 2002 |
|
|
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"extreme edge, rim or margin of something...enclosing boundary or the
space enclosed by such a boundary...the point beyond which an action,
state or condition is likely to begin or occur, to move or extend towards
some direction..." American Heritage Dictionary
My aim in this series of small paintings is to explore a possibly endless
range of emotion within very concise limitations. Unpremeditated differences
occur within the constraints of size, subject and approach. The paint
is applied very quickly and thinly so that, as a skin of paint, it dries
in one go. The speedy action of blending tones culminates in the teasing
out of a point or line of light and dark converging. A visible brushmark
may be left there, coaxed by neighbhouring tones. This small moment of
texture can evoke the immediacy of an event like a single breath or touch.
I am fascinated by the many associations that can be made with this barely
defined edge. At its most concrete, there is an illusion of something
pushing through the canvas, forwards or backwords. If the edge is horizontal,
one tends to think of landscape, if vertical, of the body. This point
or edge can seem sexually suggestive or elusive and distant, depending
on smaIl differences of tonality, color and texture. Gwen Hardie,
august 2001 |
|
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|